We recently received a copyright notice from Fechner Law in Germany. They were asking for an immediate takedown of the offending URL plus a cash settlement for use of an allegedly infringing image on an easyDNS customer’s website (which we are neither the webhost nor DNS provider for, just registrar).
They had apparently sent earlier requests which we had never received (the email address they cite has a typo in it), we finally received the copy via postal mail, instructing our client and/or MyPrivacy.net to transfer € 1,481 to their law firm.
As is standard procedure, we acknowledged receipt of their letter and asked that they supply a digital copy of it so that we may forward their complaint to our customer along with a reminder that our Plain English Terms of Service require that all clients action copyright takedown notices.
Instead of supplying that requested digital copy, we received an email response that we are obligated to provide our customer’s name and email address, and if we did not comply would have a criminal complaint brought against us:
From: Robert Fechner <robert.fechner@[redacted].com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:20:25 +0200
Subject: [Redacted] / MyPrivacy.net [14-00380]Dear Mr Jeftovic,
I appreciate your alleged concern for your users’ privacy.
Nonetheless, according to OLG Frankfurt a. Main, Urteil v. 22.8.2017,
Az. 11 U 71/16 you have to provide us at least with a name and e-mail of the infringer.If you fail to comply with the law, further proceedings will be to file a criminal complaint against you in order to acquire this information on the basis of § 14 II TMG.
In this case, additional damages due to your uncooperative and unlawful behaviour will be claimed.
We await your reply until 20.09.2019.
Sincerely,
Rechtsanwalt Robert Fechner
FECHNER LEGAL
(emphasis added)
It’s almost as if Herr Fechner doesn’t understand that Canada is a completely different country than Germany, and thus businesses operating here are subject to Canadian, not German law, meaning:
- We are subject to Canadian privacy law (PIPEDA)
- Canadian Copyright Law provides for ISPs to forward copyright infringement notices to customers (for which the ISP may charge the complainant a fee for doing so).
- We only disclose client data pursuant to a valid court order, subpoena or warrant lawfully executed in the Province of Ontario
We have further advised Herr Fechner that both easyDNS and our lawyers take a dim view of being threatened with a criminal complaint over something like this and we wonder out loud if the German bar association would have anything to say about one of their own abusing their position and misrepresenting the law in this manner.
Fechner Legal August 9 2016-Redacted4 by stuntpope on Scribd
89 15
Hey, you’ve got until the 9th day of the 20th month of this year to respond.
The letter is from 2016.
What has happened in the last 3 years?!?
They finally printed it up and put in an envelope and mailed it to us (last month).
The email exchange took place last week.
Being a German, I have two Points:
1. We do not have a Bar Assotiation for Loyers in Germany … We have a Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung and with that law you might be able to bring some justice to Mr. Fechner
2. He deserves to be punished hard for this, and if only for your ‘alleged concern’ for your users privacy. I think this is more a cornerstone of your business, and not some ‘Legend’ he is talking about. So you might go after him for endangering your business … at least in Germany I think you could do that.
They need to learn how GDPR works also, that’s not how it works.
This is quite frankly ridiculous.
For starters, EasyDNS didn’t commit the alleged violation either way and had no knowledge of it.
They know they cannot claim damages. They indirectly admitted this by demanding the data of the customer who they see as the perpetrator, so the damages part against EasyDNS is void by now. The value they quote for the damages is ridiculous in itself. But that’s how it’s done in Germany: Give a ridiculous amount to scare people and either horse trade it down in a settlement or have the court correct it for you. But they are free to ask.
§ 14 II TMG states you *may* (not must) give data to “authorities” under certain circumstances. They are not such an authority, they are civil lawyers. An authority would be a police force or a court, i.e. the state. The paragraph is there as a way for service providers to “violate” the privacy laws which would usually ban them from providing information to third parties when they want to help law enforcement agencies. It is not an obligation to actually do so (only a court might order a service provider to turn data over).
As such § 14 II TMG does not apply here at all.
What they should have quoted is § 14 IV TMG, which says civil parties can demand data (such as IP addresses) if they are harmed. But § 14 IV TMG then clarifies that this requires a court order.
The TMG gets interesting too when it comes to liability for service providers: § 10 says service providers are not liable for the storage of data by users if the provider did not have knowledge unlawful nature of such data. And further, the law states a provider does not have to do any proactive research.
Now it would be interesting to see if EasyDNS could be held liable if they knew because they did not store the data in question. Probably yes, under § 1004 BGB (Störerhaftung).
If EasyDNS or their customer disabled access to the allegedly infringing data in a timely manner, then liability for EasyDNS is out of question anyway under § 1004 BGB.
Now to OLG Frankfurt a. Main, Urteil v. 22.8.2017, Az. 11 U 71/16: This decision is hardly a final decision. Indeed, the Bundesgerichthof (BGH) suspended the process, awaiting a response from the EuGH, after which it will make a ruling (which could very well result in the lower court having to decide again based on decisions from the upper courts). See BGH, 21.02.2019 – I ZR 153/17.
You can almost be sure that the European Court of Justice (EuGH) will consider the GDPR in it’s decision too, but it has to be said too that the GDPR only came into effect after the alleged violation.
Nonetheless, the BGH already kind of decided that this is to be handled according to 2004/48/EG Art 8 Abs 2a, and that the local law § 101 Abs. 2 Nr. 3 UrhG that the lower courts decision was based on plays a subordinate role.
>If you fail to comply with the law, further proceedings will be to file a criminal complaint against you
They could try this, but the states attorney’s office would likely close the case, denying a prosecution a) because the complainant already knew the named party (EasyDNS) is not the perpetrator and b) it is a case of minor copyright infringement which do not get prosecuted (it’s about one pictures) and c) the statue of limitations might have run out already for the criminal part of copyright infringement.
If they decide to proceed, they’d proceed against the perpetrator, not EasyDNS, and might in fact nicely ask for the data of the perpetrator under § 14 II TMG, and if denied would have to go through the MLAT process between Germany and Canada.
>In this case, additional damages due to your uncooperative and unlawful behaviour will be claimed.
Nothing in German law requires you to be cooperative beyond what the law requires. Of course they can claim “additional damages” but they’d be laughed out of any court. It’s up the court to decide about damages anyway, and they can merely make claims, which to some degree they’d have to prove. “Damages” are damages and not punishment.
Oh, and you’re of course correct that you’re Canadian. But I got bad news for you: the German court system does not care. But they often do care about local laws (here Canadian laws) of the defendant and will not order a defendant to violate local laws.
tl;dr: German courts do not care about your Canadianess much, the damage claims are ridiculous, the “additional damages” claims even more so, the decision they cited is not final and binding (yet), the law they cited does not apply. But you still might be ordered to turn over the name and address, or even the IP address and other data in the end, and if you do not comply or try to ignore this because “different country”, that’s not a good idea either unless you want all your IP ranges to become a blackhole in Germany.
I would dutifully file these documents into the round filing cabinet on the floor beside my chair. This is so typical of many lawyers … send an intimidating document, and see if you hook any fish with it.
Very interesting, as I had an interaction last week that emphasized the fact that Germany, Switzerland and Canada are not the same countries, and there is no Canadian federal agency that can address digital warfare:
http://aaroncake.net/misc/showthought.asp?thought=57
backscatterer.org – an extortion scheme – our government can do nothing. He blacklists servers for adhering to RFCs. Punishes some for out-of-office auto-replies, but not others. Takes payments for delistings, and does not delist. The guy is a simple criminal. But Google, Microsoft and Facebook use his blacklist – because he targets small providers.
War is digital now, these are the opening salvos in a battle that will go on for decades.
In my opinion Canada is at war with Switzerland and Germany. Our governments just will not acknowledge it.
I received these exact emails from the same Robert guy. At first, we said no problem, we’ll take down the photo. Then he replied saying we owed for damages. LMAO. What damages. And he kept giving us chance after chance to comply. Hahahahaha! DO NOT SEND THIS CON MONEY! I told him the money was in an account Nigeria. He stopped emailing after that.
I’ve just had the same exchange and I’m in Australia
Same law firm?
How did this end? I had a lot of emails from the same law firm and today i received a letter. I’m located in Greece.
Hi there! We are also located in Greece and today we received the same letter. We consider sending them the list of witnesses from NOOR1 & Novartis.
Hi
We are having the same trouble. Did it ever come to anything?
No, we’ve never heard back from them
I also have been receiving emails from him threatening to sue me, I am in the US. I have asked for proof of said photo, and have yet to receive this. I asked him to send me mail instead of email and he has not, but continues to send me emails threatening me.
Just ignore this Robert Fechner guy. He doesn’t understand the law in the US, He sent a cease and desist to my client and demanded huge amount of cash settlement. He didn’t stop until I told him that a suit for harassment and extortion will be filed against him. The only way to treat a bully and to bully him back.
Well, being a German, having dealt with similar things:
The point that you’re missing is that indeed German courts can apply German law, if the website in question was accessible from a German computer.
Yep, sounds silly, but that’s how it is. Canadian Laws won’t help you if he pursues the infringement in Germany and gets an enforceable title over here.
Maybe, possibly, against the website itself, however most courts everywhere would require evidence of actual damages.
But against an ISP in another country, which is both bound by its own country’s privacy laws (not to divulge client data) and protected by its copyright regime (you cannot demand or threaten damages in a takedown request and the ISP can charge you a fee to forward your notice), I really don’t see it happening.
I am in the process of dealing with this same guy as well……
Yes, I am getting the mail from that guy as well. What should I do, keep ignoring. I just don’t want to reply since I think that will just encourage him
Have just received an email from this same guy demanding quite a large sum of money
Got an email from him this morning for publication of a tiny photo buried in a blog on a website that supplies equipment for profoundly disabled people. I removed it immediately. We make no profit for what we do and there are only 2 of us. This scares me. What should I do?
(Not legal advice…)
I’d just ignore it. You’ve already taken it down.
Thanks.
I’d ignore it. They are sending these threats and hope it sticks. “photographer” trinkhaus founded that company to finally make money with his photography. The way they act is illegal plus their company is registered in Poland too. There’s something sketchy about them, might be even tax fraud too.
Ignore them, and never ever reply!
Berne Convention is just a treaty not a law binding authority for any country. Countries like US and Canada used it as reference only. If they have to enforce anything in the Europe they have to go to the Europe Union of Justice. In States or Canada they have to hire another lawyer to have any legal proceeding. In US Copyright law they can claim the actual damages but no other damages and lawyer fee at all.
No case till date as far as I have gone through online, have been decided in favor of the plaintiff outside Europe based on Berne Convention.
I have been exchanging emails back and forward with them as well. I tried to settle but they seem keen on ripping me off. Has anyone actually went to trial with them?
Got a Email from this guy too. He wants over 7.200,00 Euros for sharing a couple of pictures on instagram. The photos was even tagged and linked to the photographer and his name mentioned in appreciation of his work and asking people to visit his site.
I earn a normal wage and got 3 kids and a spouse to support, barely making the rounds. And now im supposed to financially ruin my life and the lifes of my family for sharing a picture???
How can this sort of thing be allowed?
(not legal advice, yada yada…)
I would just ignore him.
what makes you think that? I got a similar message about images but he did not specify which images, just a bill. No opportunity to take down… even though I purchase all my images from a royalty free site.
I got an email this morning. Firstly he said its the 2nd email he sent me but I never got an email from him the first time. I searched my inbox and spam. Also he says it to do with an image but not specific about which image or given me an opportunity to take it down. All my images I pay for from a royalty free website so unlikely I have infringed especially has he has not said where the image is, just demanding payment for 3800 euros… sounds like a scam. I am based in the UK.
Is there an attachment? I’d check that. Most likely he sent a screenshot of the photo they click you copied.
I would not be surprised if they upload their photos to a royalty free website for people to use it for free and then go after the people who did. This whole photoclaim is a big unethical way of making money. Check the previous comments and their dodgy website in Poland for maybe tax reasons.
the attachment is just a pdf letter of exactly the same in his email. He is not specific about his client or the actual image. Just threatening.
I have had the same thing. The image was on Wikimedia under creative commons. I used it, 1 year later the image gets pulled from Wikimedia and 6 months later I get these letters. You explain and you take the image down, but the barrage of emails and letters never stops.
My thinking is how do you protect yourself against this. You need to track every image you have used and are using. How do sites with 20k images do this.
We’ve been fighting with him for two years. He’s not a bad guy, though. I’m curious: Did he tell any of you the name of the photographer? This second time, apparently, he, the photographer or some third party hacked into the archives of a client that had already paid him–i.e., it was the photo that was taken down. We’re considering action on that basis. Also, does anyone know the court proceedings? Is it like US small claims court? Or different.
he did not mention which photo at all. He is threatening court proceedings in Germany. For two years you have been fighting him! is he legit? and is he allowed to do this?
I also am in the process of dealing with this Fechner guy as well…
He keeps asking for money about a couple of photos in low quality that I posted to my personal blog, properly credited and all…
What you gona do next? His behaviour is not legal.
I am getting the same letter for a photograph on my FB page which was taken down. I am in the U.S.
I am just ignoring it. Is he really going to take all of us to court? He hasn’t even proven the photo is copyrighted in the U.S. or anywhere else.for that matter.
Same here, i from Malaysia, only one photo post on Facebook, already take down since there send me several email, and need pay them around RM20,000. But one things that know mine address, email address and company name. So should i do now?
(Not Legal Advice, etc)
Ignore it.
For anyone that got a message from fechner, check out this site:
https://sos-recht.de/abmahnung/en/robert-fechner-warning-letter/
It seems that there is another German lawyer whos specialty is to deal with fechner’s letters…
Crazy world….
I got a 3rd email threatening as a final warning to goto court and demanding money. He said under eu law he can file in Germany then take me to court in the UK…. anyway so many holes in his email.
For example the basic….. where is the copyright infringement even happening? 🤣
Hmmm do I continue to ignore him. I know the UK court will just laugh at him.
I got a final letter before he says to take me to court. Yet he has not provided the evidence of where the infringement has happened. ….. clown.
I got about 4 “final letters”
anyone else having issues?
Anyone else? I got a final letter saying he will start court proceedings but looks bogus.
We received a letter today claiming we violated his client’s copyright on our website. However, after reviewing his client’s photos, none of them are on our website. We are a nonprofit and get our photos from our National group or we pay for stock photos. he wants us to send him $1366.43 EUR or he will file a lawsuit. Our letter sounds the same as most of yours above. As of now, we are going to ignore it. I’ll probably run it by our lawyer just to have her check it out further.
Today there already send me hard copy for requested that payment RM20,000+, and if not do there will lawsuit, any can help on it?
I have not been contacted by Mr. Fechner but I have now received two bullying and harassing emails from a Mr. Zielinski who works for a company called Photography Defender (a Polish company) that works in cohoots with a company called Photoclaim. Back in 2016, I had used an image I found on Flickr Creative Commons for a blog post (for my personal, hobby, non money making blog).
Long story short, the latter is a phishing company, it’s software that trolls the Internet looking for images, contacts the photographer and then lets the photographer know their image is on such and such website. They then go after that website for a ridiculous sum of money, claiming heavy damages, legal fees etc. If it’s ignored, they’ll pursue legal action. There are so many things that I find highly suspect including the fact that like others have said in their experiences, I received this via email (not certified mail as is done with cease and desist type issues and other legal matters)…they based the damages on some abstract “MFM tables-Mittelstandsgemeinschaft Foto-Marketing” that’s only a German thing, whereas only courts can really say “x amount of money is due.” I’ve yet to find any credible mentions online about Photoclaim being successful in a court of law, especially since they would send these phishing companies out to hundreds upon hundreds of people.
From the first email I received, I did not sign Mr. Zielinki’s “cease and desist” letter. All I did was respond back letting him know I had immediately taken down the image, that my site was not a commercial site, I make no money from it, it’s a personal blog. And here in the US, my site should fall under the Fair Use Act. Not to mention, I had properly credited the photographer, linked to his page too. I was never trying to pass off anything as mine. I already spent $300USD to speak to a US lawyer about it. I did email two German attorneys just to see but it’s a scam. As the American attorney told me, only a court can specify the damages, not Mr. Zielinski from shady law firm which just preys on people to pay up out of fear.
And, Photography defender and Photoclaim both seem to be Polish companies, while Zielinski is a German attorney, and I keep being told and threatened that the German courts will try me…
Anyone have any experience with the bullies at Photoclaim or Zielinski himself?
Has anyone outside of German actually been sued by this guy? And was he successfully in applying a German court judgement in another country outside the EU?
I did want to ask-does anyone think I made it worse for myself by even replying to Zielinski’s email in which I said I had taken down the image and that I make no money from my blog and didn’t want any further issue? I’m really regretting now that I did so and wish I had never made any contact.
And-in the one document that I was sent, the one where I am supposed to sign the cease and desist, my mailing address was listed on it. Is it safe to say that was obtained in an illegal manner? Especially as I know the EU is SO big on privacy laws. That seems like a blatant violation.
Yeah, it was not a good idea to get in touch. Now we knows that there is a person behind and everything you say can be used against you – like in any cop movie. Ignore this guy. It’s a shady company from Poland (they want to save taxes), but they claim to be in Germany, since the “founder” is a bad German photographer, who cannot live from his photos. So he started this thing to sue people on the internet.
Never ever reply, take down the photo, and move on 🙂
Please someone explain why are so many people are asking if they should contact this miscreant Fechner.
Are you saying you haven’t encountered a troll before? What do you hope to accomplish by telling this garbage you are desisting ? You think he is going to say, oh, everything is resolved. Have a beautiful day? That’s when he knows he’s got a sucker worthy of pursuit.
If you still want to contact him, then please, I’ve got a bunch of Nigerian princes who’d love be your pen pal.
Just from the fact that his letters are un-certified you should know this is a third-rate troll.
PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND.
His letters – we scanned his nonsense and laughed our asses off when he raised the stakes. He started with demanding 2600 euros and today I saw the figure of 7500 euros as I was scanning his latest crap before tearing it up.
He’ll keep doing this until someone comes along and delivers his comeuppance.
At least he uses real paper so it’s good for my compost.
Got hit with the same guy. I’m in the US and went through great lengths to ensure that I was covered by US Fair Use. Robert said that I wasn’t in compliance with German Fair Use and has been trying to shake me down. The blog was a personal blog with some affiliate links here and there that never generated any revenue. Hadn’t managed the blog in years. I even tried to offer Robert a portion of the money in-line with what I felt was a reasonable lisecning fee for the photo and he still demanded thousands more. Took down the photo and the blog. Gonna ignore this guy.
IGNORE! Since April i have been tracking him, he has removed is google reviews and trustpilot and his listing on google maps. He sent me a bunch of emails and a hard letter. Some court examples but in languages I cannot read… thanks idiot. I am in the UK and is game is to play you…. you speak to a lawyer and they will charge or so he hopes you will just pay him instead of paying a lawyer.
Since April I have ignored him and he as given up. He always threatens court action but never takes action. He recycles his approach. Such a dummy! Please don’t fall for this crap
We got mail from Fechner too. He said that we have used Daniil Korzhonovs picture in our website. Funny thing is, that we don’t have any website. We don’t have any pages at all. Company is not active. Has not been many years. So? Should we pay 3200 euros?
Yesterday it was my turn. I am Hungarian. I was requested to pay 2000EUR for I don’t know what. He didn’t say what I did wrong.
I was advised to contact the Hungarian Embassy in Berlin. We’ll see if they response.
What did they say? My friend also has troubles with this Fechner and I’m also Hungarian.
I have the same situation for my company in Poland we used one photo on a blog post and got the email, they want over 5000 EUR, which is impossible for us to even think about paying, has anyone else ignored it and it has gone away?
Everybody has ignored it and it has gone away.
i receive emails for almost a year from Fechner legal company. I never replied to any of them.
Today i had a final reminder letter in my office demanding 2757.72 euro. I live in Greece I dont know the differences betwwen greek and german laws, but do you think i have to take a legal advice or to keep ignoring them?
Let’s put it this way: had Fechner actually pulled anybody into court, somebody would have probably posted it here. I think we’re the number one hit in Google for this guy.
I am in the US and received a letter from Marcin Zielinski asking for damages for a photo used on my FB page which was promptly taken down, along with the page itself. He is also threatening legal action in Germany if I do not pay up before the end of this week. He claims to have attorney partners in other countries, including the U.S. who will take up his client’s case. He references the Berne Convention in his threatening letter after I asked for proof of copyright in the US. I did consult my personal attorney and a friend who is a copyright attorney and they advised me to ignore him which I plan to do. I assume he is of a similar breed as Mr. Fechter.
He contacted me too! I did respond because when I looked him it it’s was a real firm. We took down the picture then I got 3 letters by email demanding different amounts of money. I just emailed him that I notified the fbi of his letters and the courts in Germany. And if we don’t hear from by Tuesday, we consider the case handled. I’m not paying him for a small pic that was used in an itinerary that we got from a picture free site.
My friend who lives outside of the EU also got several threatening emails from this Zielinski with the amount of money they wanted ever growing. My friend ignored them, which i believe is a good course of action. There is no court in the world that would think that these Fechner people get to take thousands of euros for the act of publishing a few pictures that are often even correctly credited and no or very little money gets made off of. I get that photographers want to be paid for their work and receive an honest price, but this slapping people who were not even realizing they did something incorrectly with thousands of euros of fees and threatening with lawsuits is NOT the way to go about it.
This is an intelligent scam, and I feel sorry for everyone who ends up in their crosshairs. What a despicable way to try and make money, they should be ashamed of themselves. I hope they try to bully the wrong guy one day who will drag them to court so they will get punished for this terrible behavior that causes a lot of unnecessary stress.
Look like this issue never end, i received this email and also hardcopy letter from year 2019 April. Until now still got many people received he letter. how to solve it?